For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Lucy Gaynor, AHM PhD candidate, will defend the dissertation '"The past is never dead". An anatomy of historical narratives at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda', supervised by Prof. Nanci Adler and Dr Thijs Bouwknegt.
Event details of PhD Defense: Lucy Gaynor
Date
16 October 2026
Time
11:00

This dissertation explores how historical narratives were constructed and contested within trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and how those constructions and contestations changed over time. Through an archival analysis of sixteen testimonies, given by five ‘historical expert witnesses’, across eight trials, it examines legal testimony as a genre of historical production. In doing so, this study demonstrates that the ICTR’s historical experts constructed historical narratives through their interactions with legal actors. Initially, they did so by establishing a space between evidence (fact) and interpretation (narrative), which they were eager, and enabled, to navigate. Over time, that space stretched, contracted, sedimented, and then deteriorated, as the narrators of history were challenged, or changed their stories; and their questioners grew more knowledgeable, more sceptical, and changed their questioning strategies. These interactions between historical and legal actors consisted of contestations over evidence, interpretation, methodology, and authority, and shaped the immediate historical narratives of the trials in which they took place, as well as the narrative jurisprudence of the Tribunal as a whole.

This dissertation makes three key contributions to existing research on history and international criminal trials. First, the granular study of more than 13,000 pages of transcripts contributes a deep, empirical, micro-historical understanding of the processes by which history was narrated at the ICTR. Second, an analysis of courtroom interactions in transcripts contributes a potential new methodological approach to ‘observing’ trials. Third, this work contributes to existing scholarship analysing the relationship between law and history in the wake of mass atrocity. It problematises the expressive, or performative function of legal transitional justice mechanisms, and argues that the apparently authoritative and robust histories in judgements rest, in fact, upon fragile narrative webs.

You can find UvA dissertations in the UvA-DARE database.

Aula - Lutherse kerk

Singel 411
1012 WN Amsterdam